Original Compass project by Davisville LabsReviewed August 2026Goal real work, evidence, and reflectionEditorial standards →
Why this project matters
Learn by doing something real.
Represent a real system with explicit assumptions, test scenarios, and communicate where the model helps and where it fails. This project feels different from a school assignment because the student serves decision makers or learners trying to understand a complex system, creates something visible, tests it honestly, responds to feedback, and explains the decisions behind the final result.
What you will create
Your project plan
Use these deliverables as milestones for Model a System Before It Breaks. Adapt the details to your interests, available time, and real-world opportunities.
01
Research question and technical brief
Research system boundary, stocks and flows, agents, feedback loops, assumptions, parameter sources, calibration, sensitivity, validation, and uncertainty. Document the needs, constraints, credible sources, and perspectives of decision makers or learners trying to understand a complex system.
02
Experimental or engineering design
Turn the evidence into a focused plan for the interactive system model and scenario lab, including success criteria, ethical boundaries, scope, and a realistic path to completion.
03
Working experiment or prototype
Create the first complete version of the interactive system model and scenario lab. Include a system diagram, assumptions ledger, data sources, working model, scenario controls, sensitivity analysis, validation attempt, and decision guide.
04
Test data and failure log
compare model behavior with known cases or expert expectations, vary critical assumptions, and document conditions where predictions should not be trusted Record what happened, what failed, what users or reviewers said, and which changes you made.
05
Final science or engineering case study
Publish the final interactive system model and scenario lab with a portfolio-ready case study showing the challenge, evidence, process, revisions, results, limits, and next version.
Make the work stronger
What separates a finished project from a meaningful one?
For Model a System Before It Breaks, use these checkpoints to protect the quality of the work without turning the project into a performance for admissions.
Avoid this
Starting the interactive system model and scenario lab before understanding decision makers or learners trying to understand a complex system
Treating assumptions or internet opinions as real evidence
Choosing a scope too large to test and finish with care
Evidence that it is working
The audience and real problem are clearly defined
Research and evidence are documented
A working interactive system model and scenario lab was created
If you want to go further
Test the work with at least five additional people from decision makers or learners trying to understand a complex system
Interview a professional connected to Systems Engineering and compare their advice with your approach
Skills you can build
Capabilities that travel beyond this project.
Mathematical ModelingSystems ThinkingScenario AnalysisExperimental DesignTechnical Communication
College application value
Use the project as evidence, not decoration.
Can demonstrate initiative, curiosity, reflection, and growth through the student’s choices, response to setbacks, work with decision makers or learners trying to understand a complex system, and development of Mathematical Modeling, Systems Thinking, and Scenario Analysis.
CuriosityProblem SolvingIterationResearchTechnical Communication
The goal of Model a System Before It Breaks is not to manufacture an impressive activity. Do real work, keep evidence of the process, and reflect honestly on what changed.
Related college majors
Which fields connect to this work?
Use Model a System Before It Breaks as a clue, then open a related major guide to compare coursework, career directions, reality checks, and other ways to test the field.
Model a System Before It Breaks is an original Compass educational starting point designed around real work, visible evidence, feedback, and reflection. It is not an admissions guarantee.