Original Compass project by Davisville LabsReviewed August 2026Goal real work, evidence, and reflectionEditorial standards →
Why this project matters
Learn by doing something real.
Translate a testable everyday claim into an ethical experiment with controls, repeatable measurement, and conclusions matched to the data. This project feels different from a school assignment because the student serves students and general audiences exposed to the claim, creates something visible, tests it honestly, responds to feedback, and explains the decisions behind the final result.
What you will create
Your project plan
Use these deliverables as milestones for Put a Popular Myth in the Lab. Adapt the details to your interests, available time, and real-world opportunities.
01
Research question and technical brief
Research claim wording, testability, variables, control, measurement reliability, sample size, replication, safety, statistical limits, and alternative explanations. Document the needs, constraints, credible sources, and perspectives of students and general audiences exposed to the claim.
02
Experimental or engineering design
Turn the evidence into a focused plan for the myth-testing experiment and science communication package, including success criteria, ethical boundaries, scope, and a realistic path to completion.
03
Working experiment or prototype
Create the first complete version of the myth-testing experiment and science communication package. Include a claim history, hypothesis, experimental protocol, materials, raw data, analysis, replication log, verdict, and public explainer.
04
Test data and failure log
repeat the experiment, invite another person to follow the protocol independently, and compare whether the result holds Record what happened, what failed, what users or reviewers said, and which changes you made.
05
Final science or engineering case study
Publish the final myth-testing experiment and science communication package with a portfolio-ready case study showing the challenge, evidence, process, revisions, results, limits, and next version.
Make the work stronger
What separates a finished project from a meaningful one?
For Put a Popular Myth in the Lab, use these checkpoints to protect the quality of the work without turning the project into a performance for admissions.
Avoid this
Starting the myth-testing experiment and science communication package before understanding students and general audiences exposed to the claim
Treating assumptions or internet opinions as real evidence
Choosing a scope too large to test and finish with care
Evidence that it is working
The audience and real problem are clearly defined
Research and evidence are documented
A working myth-testing experiment and science communication package was created
If you want to go further
Test the work with at least five additional people from students and general audiences exposed to the claim
Interview a professional connected to Experimental Science and compare their advice with your approach
Skills you can build
Capabilities that travel beyond this project.
Hypothesis TestingControlled ExperimentsScience CommunicationExperimental DesignTechnical Communication
College application value
Use the project as evidence, not decoration.
Can demonstrate initiative, curiosity, reflection, and growth through the student’s choices, response to setbacks, work with students and general audiences exposed to the claim, and development of Hypothesis Testing, Controlled Experiments, and Science Communication.
CuriosityProblem SolvingIterationResearchTechnical Communication
The goal of Put a Popular Myth in the Lab is not to manufacture an impressive activity. Do real work, keep evidence of the process, and reflect honestly on what changed.
Related college majors
Which fields connect to this work?
Use Put a Popular Myth in the Lab as a clue, then open a related major guide to compare coursework, career directions, reality checks, and other ways to test the field.
Put a Popular Myth in the Lab is an original Compass educational starting point designed around real work, visible evidence, feedback, and reflection. It is not an admissions guarantee.